User talk:Ruziklan

Hi - since nobody else has yet, let me break in your talk page and say welcome to the Wikipedia. I do hope you'll stick around, and in particular (to be completely selfish for a moment) I hope you'll write some stuff on chess problems - it's an area I've been trying to write a bit about, but I'm far from an expert, and I'm sure you can do a far better job than me. It's rather hard to know what level to pitch the articles at, given that we're meant to be a general encylopedia rather than a specialist publication, but it's certainly an area that deserves better and fuller coverage than it has right now. Anyway, I hope you have fun here, whatever you end up doing. If you need help with anything, feel free to add a question to the bottom of the Wikipedia:Help desk, or, if you prefer, ask me on my talk page - I'm always happy to show-off my vast knowledge ;)

Incidentally, perhaps you've already found it but there is also a Slovak Wikipedia which you might find interesting. --Camembert 04:07, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Category:International Judges of Chess Compositions

Should be Category:International Judges of Chess Compositions added to your user page? Or, even better, article Juraj Lörinc to be written? --AndrejJ 07:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiSk template

Hello,

I have recently founded a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you do and if you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy chess

Please see Fairy chess. --AndrejJ 20:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Grasshopper (chess). --AndrejJ 16:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy chess pieces

I have seen in my watchlist that you have removed Category Fairy chess pieces from article Fairy chess pieces. I would say it is not good idea. As is clear from the article Fairy chess pieces, there are many different fairy chess pieces existing, many of them used in over-the-board played chess variants and many used in fairy chess problems. Although most of them do not deserve own article, some of the most important surely do deserve own article, because of their properties, history, specificities, interesting points, etc. (e.g. grasshopper, nightrider, pao, lion, berolina, to name just a few most important ones) Please, reconsider that. --Ruziklan 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason why I removed it, is that the Category only contained one element, namely Fairy chess pieces. And a category with only one article in it, doesn't look good. I appreciate some of the fairy chess pieces deserve their own article, but up until this point, they have not been created. I personally was going to nominate the category for deletion. Since you feel strong about it, I won't, but somebody else might. So feel free to add the category back to the article Fairy chess pieces to prevent this. Also remember that we can delete the category for now, and create it again once a few of the dedicated fairy chess pieces articles (such as grasshopper, nightrider, pao, lion, berolina, ...) have been created. All the best Voorlandt 22:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak Wikipedians' notice board

Hi. You might be interested in checking out the brand new Wikipedia:Slovak Wikipedians' notice board. All Wikipedians interested in Slovakia or subjects somehow related to Slovakia are invited to use this noticeboard as a tool for better organizing their activities, making announcements to others with similar interests, and discussing any actual issues related to their work on Wikipedia. You are welcome to add this notice board to your watchlist, so that you could see when it is updated and thus take part in any projects, initiatives, and improvements relating to articles about Slovakia. Also, you are welcome to report your own articles here so they could be peer-reviewed and expanded by other contributors. Tankred 16:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Slovaks

Ján Andrej Segner original name is Johann Andreas Segner. He was a German. Rudolf Vrba was a Jewish ancestry, but if he lived Slovakia's area after 1918 then I removed him mistaken from this article.Nmate (talk • contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 11:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC) But both have important ties to Slovakia as you have undoubtedly noted and their inclusion was in line with 3 inclusion criteria. --Ruziklan (talk) 11:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Andreas Segner lived in the 18th century and Slovakia was not exist in that time. I removed from it the Hungarians and Germans who lived on Slovakia's area before 1918. Zipernowsky was not a Slovak ancestry presumably because he was born in Vienna, and w is not exist in the Slovak alphabet. He may was a Polish ancestry.The Great-Moravian's Slovak ancestry is strongly dubious also.

What does it mean the ancestry word for you? Ancestry as from this territory also? But this country was not exist before 1918.I felt it is anachronism if these people would reckon to Slovaks. Nmate (talk • contribs)

Uhm, have you "removed from it the Hungarians and Germans who lived on Slovakia's area before 1918"? In that case you have not made your removal fully as you surely can find many more people with this qualification. --Ruziklan (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You made a major edit during ongoing discussion

We already discussed that German person on the talk page when you made that huge edit without much reply or any real addressing of the issues. Hobartimus (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion ongoing. As far I can judge from long-time watching, some people just regularly revert any changes made to the list. I have made huge edit, but with listing changes and giving chance to discuss it point by point. You have just reverted it. OK, you have right to do that and I do not care anymore. I am off, I have other business to do. --Ruziklan (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to your claim there is a discussion, on the talk page. I don't know what's your criteria for discussion is but I'm reading everything you write there (the thread you started about Johann) on the talk page and made quite a few replies there already sometimes in a very timely fashion, let's continue there. Hobartimus (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Ruziklan, hi, I just wanted to say that I know you are usually just an occasional editor on Wikipedia, but I have definitely noticed that you have been putting a lot of work into helping resolve these Hungarian-Slovak disputes. I have been especially impressed with how you have been setting a good example of civility, being very positive, and putting a lot of energy into discussions with other editors. So I just wanted to say, "Good job," and to encourage you to keep doing what you've been doing. I hope you spend even more time on Wikipedia in the future! :) --El on ka 04:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Unfortunately I am afraid I will cease following the Hungarian-Slovak disputes in detail very soon. As is easily seen in my editing history, my editing is quite seldom, a few edits monthly, with ocassional flurry of many edits in a few days. That is when I get really hooked, but the rest of my life forces me to stop it. :-)

In any case, I am very happy someone impartial and Wikipedia-policies-skilled and really interested has stepped into this matter and invests his energy into sorting things out. Fortunately, my main area of interest, both on and off Wikipedia, namely chess composition, is not so controversial. :-) --Ruziklan (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I left you a (possibly crucial) question at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ľudovít Lehen. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak National Party

Hi, Elonka archived the thread on the main discussion page, but your latest proposal/phrasing there was acceptable to me where you said this. After this Tankred jumped in seemingly misunderstanding the discussion talking as if we were still talking about the picture /including the picture in the article. Could you include the sentence in the article/ write a few words if you changed your mind. Hobartimus (talk) 21:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right, done as agreed, thank you for reminding me. --Ruziklan (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Bitola; Madara Rider; Olena Boytsun; Gotse Delchev (town); Ľudovít Lačný; Osam; Rastislav; Alexander Khalifman; Alisa Galliamova; Grigor Parlichev; Požarevac; English Chess Federation; Pliska; Anna Muzychuk; Hilandar; Gregory Kaidanov; Gregory Serper; Yantra River; Vedea River

Cleanup: Classical Greece; Montenegrin language; Montenegrin Orthodox Church
Merge: Chess as mental training; Eastertide; Greater Albania
Add Sources: Chess master; Full-reserve banking; Anna Zatonskih
Wikify: History of the Faroe Islands; Torne Valley; Czechoslovak Legions
Expand: Geography of the Isle of Man; English American; Wilf Paiement

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Chess

Hi Ruziklan, and welcome to the WikiProject Chess ! We are always eager to see new members joining. Please do not hesitate to ask for help on the talk page of the project for any chess-related question you may have. Happy editing ! ~~

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ruziklan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Palo Macho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

... on your recent chess achievements! --AndrejJ (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Andrej. If only I had enough time for everything I'd like to do, including editing Wikipedia. I have just noticed I had not made any significant edit here for a quite long time... --Ruziklan (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ladislav Salai, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chess player (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slovakian help needed

Hello Ruziklan, I'm contacting you because we need some Slovakian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sk.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Slovakian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for inviting me. Unfortunately, I contribute to Wikipedia only once in a while now due to time constraints. I do not expect to have free time for that till November given status of my other voluntary projects. If the work is not done until then, I might consider. --Ruziklan (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ruziklan, thanks for the reply. I understand your time constraints. Best regards, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ruziklan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ruziklan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Běla Kolčáková moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Běla Kolčáková, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Běla Kolčáková

Hello, Ruziklan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Běla Kolčáková, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Běla Kolčáková

Hello, Ruziklan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Běla Kolčáková".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]